As Peer Edit an Espay: Free Peer Editing Checklist

If you want a peer editor to look for some tips, check our free checklist for editing

The idea of editing and proofreading your own essays, not to mention asking someone to help you, may not be understood. But we recommend to apply to academic writing platform. In fact, you can think that your essay is fantastic

If you are, you will deceived yourself

Don't just count it

But how do we get this done?

Most of the students are set up for good work. That's enough. He'll be getting them through school

But not good enough for the best students. They want to be great. They want to be amazing

How did you get so cool?

Call a friend to help

To make an essay beyond the draft stage with a polished version, you need a peer-to-peer editor. He doesn't have to be a professional

When you're looking for someone who wants to change your essay, try to choose someone you know well and who you can trust, be honest and methodical. You're not looking for someone to tell you how well your essay is; you're looking for someone who will give you an objective criticism of your paper. Best essay writing service.

The goal of the exercise is not to break you, it's gonna make you better

So, once you've found the perfect editor of equal partners, how can you get the most out of the exercise?

Give them our useful tips and a good checklist for editing

How to change essay on an equal level: The Councils for a successful work

The peer editors should consider the essay with the primary intent to offer recommendations on how to improve it. Here are some tips to make sure you really want to do this task

During the first pass, you will meet the essay content and the main arguments you make. In the second pass, you'll be able to easily understand what they're saying. If you do not understand the content after two readings, there is a problem that the author should know about

While you are in the process of expert changes of essays, accept the role of the reader; that is, the person who reads the essay to learn someone as opposed to being on the hunt for graceful grammatical errors. You should be concerned about the content, organization, and style in the peer-to-peer process. If you pay special attention to punctuation and spelling errors, you cannot add a significant number of values. Your role is to help the author make sure that the essay is clear and convincing

Your work as an equal editor is not to eliminate and correct all the problems that you identify; it should provide the author with a constructive feedback about how the paper can be improved

If you are an editor of a friend's essay, you do not want to hurt his feelings by pointing to areas where there is no clarity. However, if you do not do so, there is no point in participating in this process. I want you to tell me that it's all right, and instead focus on how to help the writer get to know someone from the process. Provide a constructive feedback that identifies the positive areas of the essay and also points to some areas for improvement

Do not specify operators like: "I do not understand your point of view."Instead, provide very precise information about what you do not understand, and what information can help you better understand: "Perhaps you could clarify your point of view, explaining why ..." to explain why you found something effective or ineffective

Three pillars of Excellent Peer Essay Editing

Download a free PDF using the following checklist by clicking on the image above. Here's the full details of what's on

An introduction to essay

  • Is the essay with clear, attenn-graabbing statements, or hook?
  • Are there at least three proposals in the introduction?
  • Did the author of his intention?
  • Do you have a clear understanding of what is being considered in this essay?
  • Is there a clear point?
  • Do you have at least three bodies?
  • Does each paragraph contain a clear proposal and an idea?
  • Does each content point contain a conclusion that leads to the next paragraph of the body?
  • Is the conclusion in at least three proposals?
  • Did the conclusion that he referred to his thesis?
  • Essay Flow and Coherence

  • Can ideas logically go through paper and contribute to the construction argument?
  • Are transitions correctly used?
  • esus is interesting?
  • Does the analysis presented in the document support the thesis?
  • The structure of the proposals is different?
  • The style and mechanics of the essay

  • Is the evidence properly and quoted?
  • Is each reference explicitly quoted in accordance with the appropriate style of guidance? If you're using APA, let' s take a look at this
  • Do you format the paper according to your style guide?
  • Are links, tables, and drawings in line with the style guide?
  • Is the paper read? For a complete checklist for reading, see our checklist for reading
  • Grammatical errors
  • Punctuation errors
  • This is our guide to the way the essay should be done. Anything to add? Please leave a comment